A Bad Leaver clause also aims to encourage a worker to leave the employment relationship and also act “badly”. The incentive is the prevention of losses – in general, a stronger psychological incentive than the reward. The share rights of the founders or investors may differ from the share rights for others. For example, Leaver`s good and bad dispositions should not apply equally to all shareholders. Other rights that may be included or excluded are the right to dividends, the amount of the dividend, voting rights and capital rights paid. Unlike a good Leaver, the purchase price of the shares of a bad Leavers will have a significantly lower percentage of the fair value of his shares at the time of termination of the employment relationship in the company. Bad leavers are usually those who leave the company in poor conditions after having a negative impact on the reputation or business of the company. Examples may be the party to fraudulent activities, breach of contracts or shareholder agreement, action outside one`s jurisdiction or dismissal for serious misconduct. Bad Leaver clauses are not a means of insurance for other shareholders. They exist to encourage good behavior by defining what is bad. The definition of a bad Leave could be related to reasons such as: retirement can also be a reason.
However, the law no longer has an early retirement age and an event based on age may be considered by a labour court to discriminate against other non-outgoing shareholders. The purchase price of a bad leaver`s shares will be significantly lower (sometimes by 50 to 75%) than the fair value of his shares to the company at the time of termination of the employment relationship. The shareholders` agreement or articles of association should set out clear rules for determining the exact percentage of the discount in order to avoid a possible dispute. A shareholders` agreement may also contain sub-provisions for bad graduates, for example. B a regular bad start or a very bad start (each with its own discount rate). The purchase price of the shares of a bad Leavers is usually paid on the day of the transfer of the shares in full and in cash. If the shareholders` agreement or articles of association contain sub-provisions for bad and very bad regular graduates, it would be desirable to include provisions allowing the company to withhold part of the purchase price in order to prevent a bad regular graduate from becoming a very bad graduate. These new models will be useful to a company in which some or all of its shareholders are also employed. However, since the shareholders` agreement is a contract between shareholders, it is necessary to ensure that the withdrawal provisions are linked to the employment contract of the employee shareholder, both of which are mutually exclusive. Formal legal advice may be required.
Good and bad Leavers can be defined by events or actions as broad or as narrow as shareholders can. They could be opposites – a good Leave is not bad Leaver. The next step is to determine who will buy the shares of the outgoing shareholder. If individual shareholders are unable or unwilly to buy the shares of the outgoing shareholder, the obligation should lie with the company itself. If the company does not have sufficient cash flow to acquire the shares of the outgoing shareholder, the company could lead to the sale of the shares to an external investor, subject to any rights of refusal in the company`s articles of association. They combine employee retention with the financial rewards of holding shares and the abandonment of the employment relationship (voluntary or in the event of dismissal) at the end of holding shares and ensure that the exit plans of all shareholders are similar. Shares held by a Leaver may not be forcibly purchased unless the articles of association and/or the shareholders` agreement so provide. . . .